[ACCEPTED]-Which is faster between storing images in Mongo GridFS or Amazon S3?-database

Accepted answer

Score: 21

This is like comparing Go vs Node.js. There's 12 no better general solution.

Each might have 11 their own advantages and solutions. MongoDB 10 is more like the DIY solution, and Amazon 9 S3 is the managed solution. With MongoDB 8 you have to scale it yourself. I can say 7 S3 will be faster initially and it's already 6 scaled by Amazon, and probably cheaper(S3 is cheaper than EBS). You 5 can get a lot of servers with huge amounts 4 of RAM and MongoDB will definitely be faster. Also 3 if the MongoDB instance is in the same instance 2 as your App, you will have less latency.

Also 1 check this question: MongoDB as static files provider?

And this: What are the advantage of using MongoDB GridFS vs Amazon S3 to store assets for a product with MongoDB as the database backend?

Source: stackoverflow.com

[ACCEPTED]-Which is faster between storing images in Mongo GridFS or Amazon S3?-database

Canvas tainted by CORS data and S3

Node js mongodb database connection error failed to connect to server

What is the best practice to connect/disconnect to a database?

Mongoose: remove() returns true for already deleted items

How to sort two fields with mongoose?

MongoDB Atlas database vs MongoDB local, which is best for SaaS in terms of transaction speed (Querying)

Using Amazon S3 as a File System for MongoDB

Best way storing binary or image files

Store Images in MySQL Database

Is there a way to upload to S3 from a url using node.js?